The Life Cycle of a Cult tends to be defined by specific steps.
A charismatic leader or figureheads present a new and transcendent idea offering a solution for disconnected individuals.
So here we are. They’re getting ready to confront the system in Australia. The gunships are circling. Smoke is rising from the sidelines. One individual, naked, shivering, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT displayed prominently in chicken blood, has emerged through the lines and is taken aside in secrecy for a temporary assignment in county cricket.
Remember the start, when the world was still young? The initial phase, of pure instinct.
Cult leaders guarantee a fresh beginning, a brighter tomorrow, support, salvation within a community who all believe in the method.
How did it feel initially? Just men on a balcony feeling good. Tattoos. Forearms. Determination. Confident masculinity. Admittedly, England’s players will claim they don’t use the label, amusingly as it’s denied, what did we see?
Yet it’s clear the concept. It’s the batsman executing a stroke so depraved it defies description. It’s the thrill of the leader in ultimate mode, an expression conveying: thoughtful warrior, beard made of wood, natural look, truly contemporary you almost imagine to notice and notice he’s fielding in the field bare-chested holding a fish.
It’s the opener still being allowed addressing the media, appearing as a happy little woodland creature in a waistcoat, uttering phrases such as we’re challenging norms. Indeed, the vibe, for quite a long time, was entirely positive.
Building period. Togetherness strengthened through repetition of the cult’s slogans. These beliefs may seem irrational as a test of “true belief”.
Am I alone? The criticism, the fury, the sense of betrayal post-defeat appears excessive, too much. England batted badly during the match, as history shows. They were savaged in the field during a brief period as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, manipulated by the batsman imitating their style effectively, adaptive to conditions, a performer excelling with brilliance.
Currently, we see the attacks, the anger, the view of the sport as a kind of abomination. The consensus is that England don’t just need to lose, they need to lose righteously, to be purged, obliterated, overwhelmed through sheer skill of the pace attack, the conventional tactics of the veteran, seen enjoying successes with a bashful smile like he’s just been given a nice new fishing rod. What will this do to them?
Problems arise because of mistakes. But the cult cannot admit errors. It turns to hatred of the outside world.
The fact remains, half a week out the upcoming game, we have now reached a delicious point of tension in the journey of this approach. England could quite easily win overseas in a blur of adrenal disruption. More likely, they could lose just as quickly. Should they fail it seems we may see the death cult phase.
Ahead of this, several aspects to consider about this. More than two years ago, back in those heady early days, of optimism and energy, a column appeared labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which was helpful since it’s clear a method to show that it’s not a closed group is should followers respond with anger rejecting criticism of the philosophy.
What has happened recently is just as interesting. Opposition to the style has turned into a movement. Social media is furious, disappointed commentators, shots of angry middle-aged travelling fans disappointed by the short match, similar to people wanting fairness.
On the other hand, we have the wider backdrop of the opponent’s mixed ingrained annoyance with the aggressive tourists, stating, your cherished traditions and have developed to distinguish yourselves culturally from us, well, it’s all a bit of a gag ultimately.
And this is the real point. It’s all cults. The style was a trend since the sport itself is insular. Or rather, the sport in England is closed, a group, an elite gathering, an insular community with a long history of opaque and ritualistic cult history supporting it. Historically, this was where entry is limited. It’s the colonial game of the nation, the original sports washers. And guess what, Britain is itself a cult, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a royal family remains.
England’s cricketers have been isolated in this environment since childhood. Seeking change, to create a less brutal environment, they are just repeating their own experience, building another enclosure, a limited community, but doing it this time with a modern squad and a coach encouraging individuality as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.
Live where your feet are. Confront risks. But no matter how fast and far you run, you remain stuck.
With this mind, it is perhaps the moment to offer compassion for the movement, to recognize its positives, which are significant. What does it represent? Promoting liberation. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with
Aria Vance is a savvy shopping expert and deal hunter, dedicated to uncovering the best VIP discounts and sharing money-saving tips with readers.